FG Nexus Begins ETH Acquisition to Build Large Treasury Holdings
Fundamental Global Inc., doing business as FG Nexus, has launched an initiative to acquire and hold large amounts of ether, aiming to become one of the largest corporate holders of the cryptocurrency. The Charlotte-based company said Monday it began its acquisition on July 30 with a purchase of 6,400 ether, matching the amount mined in Ethereum’s first block in 2015. As of Aug. 10, FG Nexus reported holdings of 47,331 ether valued at $4,228.40 per token, according to Bloomberg pricing. The company funded the purchases via full proceeds from a previously announced $200 million private placement, the company stated in a press release. Strategy to Focus on ETH Yield FG Nexus said its primary performance metric will be “ETH Yield,” defined as ether held per share. The company plans to stake and restake its ether holdings to generate returns and participate in Ethereum-based financial activities, such as tokenized real-world assets and stablecoin yield. The company described its approach as building a long-term reserve of ether while seeking to generate ongoing returns for shareholders. No timeline was provided for achieving its accumulation goals, but executives have stated that they aim to eventually hold 10% of the total ether supply in circulation. Partnerships for Custody and Management FG Nexus is working with Anchorage Digital for custody and trade execution of its ether. Anchorage Digital, a federally chartered digital asset bank, provides secure storage for cryptocurrency holdings. The company has also partnered with Galaxy, a digital asset and investment management firm, to serve as its asset manager. Steve Kurz, Galaxy’s global head of asset management, said the arrangement provides investors with structured exposure to ether within a managed framework. FG Nexus leaders cited Ethereum’s growing role in global finance as a reason for the move, noting its use in decentralized finance applications and digital asset settlement systems. The company did not disclose further acquisition plans or whether it will diversify into other digital assets.
Ethereum Validator Performance Report 2025
2022 marked a turning point for Ethereum as it fully transitioned to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus, shifting how Ethereum achieved network security and decentralization for its users. Ethereum now relies on validators, individuals and/or entities who stake ETH, to propose and attest to new blocks. Key Takeaways By all accounts, the expanded number of validators is a double-edged sword. It signifies growing trust in Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake (PoS) model and trust in staking as a reliable passive income source and also brings along challenges like decreased rewards, increased operational costs, and increased hardware. This article provides an in-depth analysis of validators on Ethereum in 2025. Highlights of Ethereum Validator Performance in 2025 In 2025, Ethereum’s validator ecosystem officially entered a new chapter as it achieved high credits and faced numerous limitations. The number of active validators at 1. 07 million (beyond the 1 million limit) is not just a signal of Ethereum’s decentralized philosophy but also a need to accommodate the number of validators with scaling and efficiency improvements. Thankfully, the recent Pectra upgrade, implemented on May 7, 2025, responded to these problems with a world first—validator consolidation. Effective in Pectra, validator consolidation enables an individual validator to be responsible for 2,048 ETH (not 32 ETH). This major development will help reduce the number of validators, simplify management, and reduce congestion, solving recent complaints about the disruption of decentralization and security. With the Pectra upgrade, larger stakers will now have the ability to better consolidate and utilize their infrastructure, while the smaller validators will enjoy better network performance as a whole. The most exciting trend this year is the democratization of staking. Onboarding tools by Dappnode, Stereum, and Avado encourage the creation of validator node operations. Even more exciting than these tools is the continued adoption of Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) that enables multiple parties to share validator responsibilities in a trust-minimized manner. Decentralized protocols like Rocket Pool and Obol Network are enabling communities and solo stakers to pool assets together without losing control. These efforts reduce reliance on centralized exchanges and custodians. Ethereum’s validator nodes now span across 80 countries. Traditional validator hotspots like the U.S. and Germany still dominate the space, but experts are seeing huge growth in places like West Africa, Southeast Asia, South America, and Eastern Europe. This growing geographic diversity makes Ethereum more resilient to regional regulation, outages of infrastructure, and centralization risks. Despite Ethereum’s increased decentralization, it is still influenced significantly by major bodies. Lido is still the largest staking service in the ecosystem, having some liquid staking solutions that are hard to ignore. Rocket Pool also continues to thrive among the stronger, more technical users in Ethereum. In the custodial world, there are a host of exchange options like Coinbase, Binance, and UEEx providing services to institutional and retail users who are more interested in convenience than decentralizing control in their staking options. However, while they are marginal, solo stakers are becoming increasingly part and parcel of the spirit and ethos in the network. They also usually produce the highest performance rates and are true to Ethereum in terms of independence and their approach to decentralization. Read Also: Ethereum Vs Ethereum Classics Validator Performance Metrics Validator performance is essential for Ethereum’s security and longevity in the proof-of-stake journey. As staking gets older, uptime and availability have become two of the most critical metrics we can use to assess validator performance. Let’s recap how uptime is performing across the network, which validators are best, and why downtime, even for a couple of minutes, could cost you big. Average Uptime Across Validators Based on data collected from Beaconcha.in, the average validator uptime on Ethereum is approximately 99.2% as of Q2 2025, which is indicative of the increasing professionalism and technical maturity of validators operating throughout the world. Yet, this doesn’t mean that all participants are up to the mark, especially in areas where power and internet collapse frequently. Even in a strong PoS network like Ethereum, downtime is costly—financially and reputationally. When a validator is down, they are not attesting to blocks and directly losing future rewards. In other more extreme incidents (prolonged outage, multiple incidents), the validator may be penalized or have their rock-solid reputation slashed. Reward Yields In Ethereum’s proof-of-stake model, reward yields are the primary motivator for validators. Whether you are a solo validator staking from your home to earn rewards or part of a staking pool using a centralized exchange or a decentralized protocol, return on investment (ROI) is an important measure of performance. 2025 has seen a huge shift in the staking reward landscape—primarily due to an increase in the number of validators, improvements in validator efficiencies, and the Pectra upgrade. Here is a detailed look at what reward yields look like in 2025, how they have changed since 2024, and what types of validator setups are generating the most rewards. Monthly and Annual Staking Rewards (2025) As Ethereum surpassed 1,000,000 active validators, the staking rewards have had expected dilution and the base reward per validator is lower. However, if the validator operates efficiently, it is possible to earn above-average returns. Metric 2024 (Verified) 2025 (Projected) Notes Avg APR 4.8%–6.2% 3.9%–5.1% • Current June 2024: ~5.2% • Decline due to more validators & EIP-7514 cap Monthly Return ~0.43% ~0.37% Derived from APR (compounded) Active Validators ~1,000,000 1.2M–1.5M) • June 2024 actual: ~1M • Growth driven by liquid staking & institutions Validator Consolidation Not available Enabled via Pectra (EIP-7251) • Allows up to 2048 ETH/validator • Expected 2025 but no confirmed date Key Risks • Slashing • MEV volatility • Regulatory uncertainty • Lower rewards • Centralization risks from large pools 2025 assumes no major regulatory crackdowns This yield decrease doesn’t mean that there are lower profits. Plenty of well-optimized validators in 2025 earn more profits because of reduced downtime, leading-edge MEV tactics, and block proposer benefits. ROI Analysis: Solo Stakers versus Staking Pool In the realm of staking, not all validators are the same. Your ROI is dependent on costs,
Key Difference Between Crypto Scalping and Swing Trading Every Investor Should Know
The crypto sphere in 2025 is a $3 trillion+ market, where the 30-day volatility of Bitcoin stays around 45-60%—which is more than that of the S&P 500. As altcoins such as Solana and Ethereum spike 200%+ during a bull market, active traders enjoy huge profit potential—but only if they take the right strategy. The debate between scalping and swing trading is a common one in the crypto space. Both strategies can be highly profitable, but they demand very different skill sets. Scalping demands laser-sharp focus; swing trading demands patience. If you make the wrong choice, you become one of the 90% of traders who may lose money. While they help generate profits from price movements, they differ vastly in practice, time commitment, and risk. Continue reading as we analyze scalping vs. swing trading in crypto. Key Takeaways Read Also: Cryptocurrency Scalping Strategies: A Comprehensive Guide What is Crypto Scalping? Scalping is a high-frequency cryptocurrency trading strategy in which the trader aims to make many small profits through exploiting small price movements throughout the day. This trading strategy features lightning-quick trades that can last anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes. For example, a scalper might buy Bitcoin (BTC) for $50,000 and sell it for $50,050, making a quick $50 profit before closing the trade. Doing this dozens, if not hundreds, of times over the course of a day, profits add up—assuming the trader does so exactly and efficiently. Since scalping involves capitalizing on minuscule market inefficiencies, one needs speed and accuracy. Traders often employ sophisticated charting software and technical indicators to spot entry and exit prices in real time. Important Features of Scalping Here are some of the most important features that make up crypto scalping: Scalpers can execute 30 to 300+ transactions in a day. The approach is to profit from minute price movements rather than waiting for big price movements. Such micro-profits accumulate but require steady attention. Scalping heavily depends on real-time data and technical indicators like Who Is Scalping Most Appropriate For? Scalping is appropriate for the following types of traders: What is swing trading in crypto? Not every crypto trader is ready to sit in front of a screen all day executing quick trades. If you’d prefer to take a more patient, strategic approach that’s still profitable, swing trading crypto may be the best fit for you. Definition of Swing Trading Swing trading is a day-to-day crypto trading strategy that aims to capitalize on price action over a number of days to a few weeks. Unlike scalping, which profits from quick, minor moves, swing trading targets larger market swings—typically after a period of consolidation or trend confirmation. For instance, assume Ethereum (ETH) has been trading around $3,000. A swing trader might go long on the breakout and remain in until the stock is at $3,300—a 10% gain—before closing out. This entire trade might last 5 to 10 days, depending on the momentum of the market and outside developments. Swing trading falls somewhere between day trading and long-term investment, allowing traders to profit from short-term fluctuations and longer-term trends. Key Features of Swing Trading Swing crypto trading has a different strategy and arsenal than scalping. Here’s how it differs: Swing traders typically trade between 1 and 10 times a week. Rather than tracking each and every price twitch, they’d rather wait for clean setups through the use of trend lines, support/resistance levels, or chart patterns. Swing traders mix unlike scalpers, who hardly ever glance at charts in isolation. They combine both fundamental and technical analysis like: Swing trading is suited for those who cannot watch charts all day. Most traders employ a “set-and-forget” strategy with stop-loss and take-profit orders so they can trade passively. Because trades are rolled over overnight for extended periods, swing traders are subject to overnight risk, such as surprise news or market gaps that occur in hours of low liquidity—most notably at weekends. Proper risk management is essential. Who Is Swing Trading Most Appropriate For? Swing trading is appropriate for a person who wants to stay active in the market without the pressure of making minute-to-minute decisions. It is ideally suited: Scalping vs. Swing Trading: Key Differences While both scalping and swing trading aim to profit from price movement, they achieve this at different time scales and with varying intensities. Scalping involves capturing small price moves rapidly and frequently, whereas swing trading deals with large, long-term price swings over a longer time. The table compares scalping and swing trading.: Comparison Table: Scalping vs. Swing Trading in Crypto Feature Scalping Swing Trading Time Frame Seconds to minutes (e.g., 1-min, 5-min charts) Days to weeks (e.g., 4-hour, daily charts) Trade Frequency High (50-100+ trades/day) Low (1-10 trades/week) Profit Goals Small profits per trade (0.1%-1%), cumulative Larger profits per trade (5%-20%) Risk Exposure Lower per-trade risk, higher overall due to leverage & frequency; no overnight risk Higher per-trade risk due to overnight/weekend volatility; fewer trades mean less cumulative cost impact Analysis Approach Primarily technical (MACD, Bollinger Bands, RSI, volume) Technical + fundamental (market news, project developments, economic factors) Below is a detailed comparison: Pros and Cons of Scalping Below are some pros of crypto scalping and the cons of scalping crypto; Pros of Scalping Scalping offers a number of compelling advantages, particularly in fast-moving markets like cryptocurrency; Scalping allows traders to close positions within minutes or seconds, reducing exposure to major market swings or long-term downturns. This makes it a viable strategy in uncertain macroeconomic conditions. Scalping works best in highly liquid markets, such as BTC/USDT or ETH/USD pairs, where you can enter and exit trades instantly with minimal slippage. Crypto markets are known for their frequent price swings. Scalpers can benefit from micro-movements without needing a large price shift to profit. Even when the broader market lacks a strong directional trend, small price fluctuations within a narrow range can still generate multiple profitable trades daily. Scalping strategies can be coded into trading bots for 24/7 execution, especially useful in the non-stop
