(2024)

FixedFloat

1000 BTC
image-right

Year

2024

Network

The hack specifically targeted FixedFloat's smart contract functionalities, not a single blockchain network. However, the stolen assets were likely BTC and ETH.

Country

Founder

Incident Name

volume_up

Effect

Financial Loss: Approximately $26.1 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) stolen at the time of the hack. (Current value depends on market fluctuations). Disrupted Operations: FixedFloat suspended operations to address the vulnerability and potentially improve security measures.

Eroded User Trust: The hack significantly damaged user trust due to concerns about the platform's security and lack of Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) procedures. Market Impact: The broader cryptocurrency market experienced a decline in investor confidence as this incident highlighted potential vulnerabilities in smart contract code.

Outcome

Immediate: Financial loss, disrupted operations, and eroded user trust. Long-term: Potential regulatory scrutiny, increased insurance costs for cryptocurrency platforms with similar vulnerabilities, and a more cautious user base.

Type

Smart Contract Exploit

Money Impact

$26.1 million at the time of the hack

Causes

Vulnerability in Smart Contract Code: The attacker exploited a flaw in the logic governing loan repayments within FixedFloat's smart contract. This allowed them to manipulate their perceived share of the total borrowed funds and withdraw more than they had deposited. Flash Loan Exploit: The attacker leveraged a flash loan – a temporary, unsecured loan from a DeFi lending protocol – to facilitate the manipulation. The stolen funds were used to repay the flash loan, leaving the attacker with the remaining profit.

Affected user/account

All users with funds stored on FixedFloat were potentially affected.

Recovery Efforts

FixedFloat likely focused on patching the vulnerability and potentially recovering stolen funds

Regulatory Response

Regulatory response depends on FixedFloat's location and licensing. However, this incident could highlight the need for stricter regulations regarding smart contract audits and potential vulnerabilities within DeFi protocols.

Market Impact

$26.1 million at the time of the hack

Technological Details

The exploit involved manipulating the logic within the "borrow" and "repay" functions of the smart contract through a flash loan.

Investigation Details

Insurance Coverage

Public Relations Response

Lesson Learned

Smart Contract Audits: Rigorous audits by independent firms are essential to identify and rectify vulnerabilities in smart contract code before deployment. Flash Loan Risks: DeFi protocols need to implement robust security measures to mitigate potential flash loan

Ownership Transfer TX

Incident Review

On February 16, 2024, FixedFloat, a cryptocurrency exchange that operated with limited Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) procedures, fell victim to a significant hack. FixedFloat offered users a platform to buy, sell, and trade various cryptocurrencies. While not the largest exchange, it catered to a specific niche within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Background and Incident Details:

The specific circumstances leading up to the hack are unclear. FixedFloat likely implemented some standard security measures, but these proved insufficient.

Exploit Method:

The attack involved a flash loan exploit, a complex manipulation of smart contract functions using borrowed cryptocurrency. Here's a breakdown:

Flash Loan Acquisition: The attacker obtained a large flash loan – a temporary loan of cryptocurrency from a DeFi lending protocol.

Exploiting Repay Function: The attacker used the borrowed funds to interact with FixedFloat's smart contract, manipulating the logic within the "borrow" and "repay" functions.

Inflating Debt Share: By exploiting a vulnerability in the contract's calculations, the attacker inflated their perceived share of the total borrowed funds within the pool.

Withdrawing Excess Funds: With an inflated share, the attacker could then withdraw a significant amount of cryptocurrency from FixedFloat's reserves, exceeding the actual value of the flash loan borrowed.

Repaying Flash Loan: The attacker used a portion of the stolen funds to repay the flash loan, effectively disappearing with the remaining profit.

Technical Vulnerability:

The exploit hinged on a flaw within the smart contract code, specifically the logic governing how loan repayments were calculated. This vulnerability allowed the attacker to manipulate their position within the lending pool.

Impact Analysis:

Financial Loss: Estimates suggest the attacker stole approximately $6.5 million worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum at the time. (Current value depends on market fluctuations).

Disrupted Operations: FixedFloat temporarily halted operations to address the vulnerability and prevent further losses.

Eroded User Trust: The hack significantly damaged user trust due to concerns about the platform's security and lack of KYC/AML protocols.

Market Impact: The broader DeFi and cryptocurrency market experienced a decline in investor confidence as this incident highlighted potential vulnerabilities in smart contract code.

Response and Resolution:

FixedFloat: They reacted quickly to patch the vulnerability in the smart contract and improve internal security measures. However, details on user compensation were limited.

Law Enforcement: Due to the international and decentralized nature of cryptocurrency, investigations by law enforcement are complex.

Security and Compliance:

Security Shortcomings: FixedFloat's security measures proved inadequate, likely due to a lack of rigorous smart contract audits and potential vulnerabilities in the borrow/repay logic.

Limited Compliance: FixedFloat's lax KYC/AML procedures might have facilitated the attacker's anonymity and hindered potential tracing of stolen funds.

Broader Implications for the Cryptocurrency Community:

Smart Contract Audits: The FixedFloat hack emphasizes the importance of thorough security audits by independent firms to identify and rectify vulnerabilities in smart contract code.

Focus on DeFi Security: The incident highlighted the need for stricter security practices within the DeFi space, particularly regarding robust code audits and potential lending pool exploit vectors.

KYC/AML Importance: The lack of KYC/AML protocols at FixedFloat made tracing the attacker and potentially recovering stolen funds more challenging. This incident strengthens the case for implementing stricter compliance measures within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Conclusion:

The FixedFloat hack exposed vulnerabilities in smart contract logic and the potential consequences of lax security practices. It serves as a stark reminder for the importance of rigorous audits, robust code development, and potentially stricter industry standards, including KYC/AML compliance. By prioritizing security and user trust, the cryptocurrency community can build a more secure and sustainable future.

Additional Insights:

Cybersecurity experts emphasize the need for:

Multi-signature wallets to authorize significant cryptocurrency transfers.

Regular penetration testing to identify and address potential exploit vectors within DeFi protocols.

Stronger KYC/AML procedures to deter malicious actors and improve transparency within cryptocurrency exchanges.

By implementing these recommendations, the cryptocurrency industry can work towards a more secure and trustworthy environment for all participants.

Links

Explained: The FixedFloat Hack (February 2024): https://www.halborn.com/blog/category/explained-hacks Crypto Exchange FixedFloat Suffers Second Security Breach With $2.80 Million Lost: https://beincrypto.com/ (This article highlights a separate security incident)

UEEx makes trading easier

Join the official Telegram Channel

©2024, UEEx All Rights Reserved FINTRAC Registered